Embryo Disposal in GATTACA
In the movie, GATTACA, people have learned how to genetically modify babies before they are born so that they have the best genes from the parents, usually considered “perfect” genes. In this process, the parents are shown a few of the embryos from the in-vitro fertilization, and pick the one they like best. At this point, it is really just a matter of preference of gender. The other embryos that are not chosen serve no other purpose. It is a seemingly normal situation - they picked one and that is all that really matters - but what did happen to the other embryos? According to most peoples’ morals, human life is the top priority, so what is to be done about the discarded embryos?
In the movie, nothing after the selection of the embryo is shown, so there is no real evidence to what actually happened. It is to be assumed that since there are so many people doing this kind of fertilization, they must have a system for disposal of the other embryos. There does not seem to be any other purpose for the excess of embryos, so why wouldn’t they be thrown out? There could be some kind of surrogate system in place, where a couple who was unable to have any children could “adopt an unborn child”, but it seems unlikely. With so many people having so many extra embryos, at some point a substantial amount of excess would need to be disposed of. And that raises the question of how are they disposed of? Are they simply thrown out with the rest of the unwanted trash? That seems a bit humiliating, for human life, even at its earliest stage, to be disposed of like it doesn’t matter.
And then, it is also important to consider the morals of the whole event. Essentially, the parents are creating a few embryos and picking one as the best and discarding the rest. That seems a little unfair - pre-birth favoritism. And sure, there is a lot of debate over when a fertilized egg becomes a human life. Some of that is deeply personal to each individual person because people have different beliefs about life. I understand that while some people believe even at the stage of a zygote, life of the zygote has the same value as the life of a 40 year old human, while others believe that it is not even a conceivable thought that that tiny embryo could eventually be a person. What makes the difference is that the people are choosing to have multiple children, if they were to keep all, but then keep one and forget about the rest. The fact remains though, that this is not the mindset of the parents. The purpose of this in-vitro fertilization is to give their child the best shot at life that they can give it. That’s not cruelty or murder of the other embryos - it is unconditional love for one of them. The other embryos are just a byproduct of their perfect child. Not even a thought in the parents’ minds. And while that sounds horrible, it isn’t really. While the whole process may be looked at as morally wrong, what the parents are doing, I think, is not.
When discussing the discarded embryos and their value as humans, it is impossible to not see the similarities between it and abortion. They are very similar in that they deal with the themes of when human life begins. Abortion is generally known as termination of a pregnancy, usually within the first 28 weeks. By that definition, abortion and what is happening with the embryos in GATTACA is not all that similar. In GATTACA, one of the babies still lives, and the disposal of the embryos isn’t the main goal like it is with abortion. The similarities occur in the whole human life side of things. If one person says that abortion is murder and another argues that the child is not alive yet, who is to say who’s right? The same goes with the embryos that aren’t used in GATTACA. Personally, I believe in letting the mother have the choice of abortion. I find it hard to condemn a woman to a life with a baby that she does not want. And if she is forced to keep it, then what is saving that child from having a possibly horrible life with a mother that can’t take care of it? An even bigger issue is the conflict of children of rape. Should a mother be forced to keep the child then? Of course not, because what mother would want that child as a living reminder. This highlights the issue in GATTACA. In most abortions, the child is some form of accident. In GATTACA, the extra embryos were creating consciously with the will and consent of both parents. And then, they are discarded, to probably never be thought of again. I make no claim that this is immoral, because I don’t know when a human becomes alive. I do think that it is very different from abortion, because of the thought gone into what could be successful lives. The parents chose to create those embryos, but care no more after the one they want is chosen. It is odd, however, to consider the extreme controversy of abortion compared to the ignorance of embryo disposal in GATTACA.
In GATTACA, a world where people can be genetically modified to a “perfect” form, it is hard to think about the steps along the road to the genetically perfect human. The goal is the person, a person who can be the higher order of society. Who would ever stop to consider the the process of getting there? For one perfect baby to survive, other embryos have to be discarded. The question remains of is that a bad thing? Each person who chooses to have a child has to do some serious thinking about life with that baby. Serious consideration on if it is truly a good idea to have a child must take place. For the embryos that aren’t thought about, that aren’t picked as “the one”, there is simply nothing for them. It is not good or bad, they have not been killed or preserved, they just are. Neither right nor wrong. Simply a byproduct of the perfect human.